GTM Unleashed: Marketing Personas: The Grand Illusion or Budget Black Hole?

Alright, marketers, brand gurus, and self-proclaimed strategists! Hold onto your spreadsheets because we’re about to challenge one of your dearest darlings: the ubiquitous ‘Marketing Persona.’ Are these detailed, oft-colorful depictions of ‘Techie Tara’ or ‘CEO Charlie’ really your compass, or are they merely dazzling distractions burning through your budget?

Let’s cut through the noise: Personas, in theory, are brilliant. They give a face to the amorphous mass of your target audience, humanizing the abstract. But here’s the provocateur’s bite: are these painstakingly crafted caricatures genuinely insightful, or have they become expensive paperweights in the vast office of marketing strategies?

Dollars are spent, meetings are held, and narratives are spun around these personas, and yet, a gnawing question persists: do they truly capture the essence of your audience, or are they just broad-brush stereotypes? Is ‘Millennial Mike,’ with his love for avocados and tech-savviness, really a revelation, or is he just a shallow figment of a marketer’s imagination?

Genuine, authentic insight is derived from deep, data-driven understanding. It comes from diving into the trenches of customer feedback, from rigorous analytics, and from being unafraid to challenge assumptions. In stark contrast, slapping together personas can sometimes be nothing more than playing with fancy Lego sets devoid of real-world relevance.

Now, this isn’t a call to abolish personas. But it’s a dare. A dare to question, scrutinize, and demand more from every penny of that marketing budget. Do your personas genuinely serve your strategy, or are they mere relics of a bygone era?

In the spirit of audacious reflection, let’s embrace the wisdom of George Bernard Shaw: “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” So, before another cent is spent crafting ‘Startup Sally’ or ‘Entrepreneur Eddie,’ marketers ask yourself: Are you genuinely connecting or merely conjuring illusions?

I focus exclusively on developing Ideal Customer Profiles vs. Personas since my sweetspot is B2B.   Here’s the difference:


  1. Detail Depth: Personas are detailed archetypes of a typical user or buyer. Think of it as giving a face, name, and backstory to your audience segment.
  2. Characterization: It goes beyond demographics. Personas encapsulate psychographics, behaviors, motivations, pain points, and aspirations. If you’re selling software, for example, you might have ‘Tech-savvy Tina’ who’s always on the lookout for the latest tech tools to boost her team’s productivity.
  3. Usage: Personas help teams, especially design, product, and content teams, to empathize with users and create solutions tailored to their needs.
  4. Multiplicity: For one product or service, there can be multiple personas, representing different user types or buyers.

Ideal Customer Profile (ICP):

  1. Macro View: While personas are about the individual, ICPs zoom out and define the ideal organizations or segments you’re targeting. It’s about the ‘perfect fit’ for your product or service at a larger scale.
  2. Criteria-based: ICPs are usually built using specific criteria like industry type, company size, revenue, location, technological maturity, and more.
  3. Usage: ICPs guide sales and marketing teams in lead generation and qualification. It helps them focus their efforts on targets that are more likely to convert and yield high lifetime value.

Singularity: Typically, a company would have one ICP, which represents the ‘gold standard’ of whom they’re trying to attract. This doesn’t mean they won’t sell to others, but this profile represents the best fit and highest value.

Like this message? Give me two minutes a day and I’ll help you scale your business so that customers are willing to pay a premium for what you offer and keep paying for it.